Nowadays, there are a variety of studying methods; each of them has its own technic in the furtherance of delivering data efficiently. Accordingly, some people argue that learning in a group has more efficacy than individual learning. Personally, I utterly agree with this opinion for several reasons.
Firstly, working in groups help individuals to acquire some beneficial skills that will aid them in their social and work life. In other words, if people work in a team, they will know how to distribute tasks successfully, and exploit every member to reach the team's maximum potential. Furthermore, most of the companies are now emphasizing on team-work skills. For instance, they could refuse distinctive employees due to the lack of cooperation between them and their team members.
Secondly, people would not have the chance to increase their knowledge or correct a misconception individually. To clarify, the more they are exposed to questions and ideas, the more cognition they will acquire. In addition, without being introduced to different points of view, they will not recognize that they had understood something improperly. One salient example that proves this opinion, a research that was made in Yale University in 2010 on two groups of students who are studying the same subject; It was found that the group which members had studied individually had less comprehension than the other group which had studied together.
To recapitulate, group learning is vastly helpful in the education process, because not only will it support people to get some useful skills, but it will also increase the effectiveness of perception among students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...lient example that proves this opinion, a research that was made in Yale University in 201...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35496183206 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166342984 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63358778626 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2732382221 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176754295435 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590976743018 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655484159191 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110554792127 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047263331576 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.