In contemporary epoch, tourists have been palying crucial role for nation. It is argued by some people that whether accountable of the environmentally along with socially ought to be taken by the visitors or not. I fully agree with the given statement, and would discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs with the conclusion at last.
To embark, fatal polluction of environment will descend by leaps and bounds. For instance, personages have been coming from manifold region or state in order to visit many distinct marvellous paradise place. Due to dearthing of essential time, folks do not prefer to cooking and cleaning at place. Instead, trippers prefer to eat fast foods whic are wreppered by either plastic or paper. After eating fast foods, humans are throwing wrepper on the street rather than dustbeens which have been yielded by bureaucrat. If vactioners will take liable regarding not merely community but also environmentally, hazardious polluction would decline. Consequently, it is beneficial for mankind besides nation.
Moreover, trippers will live away from the conflict between the local folks of the nation. To illustrate, foreign's people have been coming for visiting tremendous building and temples for knowing concering religious as well as retiaul to live away from hustle and bustle life. Person does not follow to rules in temple; individual unfollow the rules. Due to that, conflict will be created between host country's people and foreign's people. If people follow the rules, he or she would love away from it. It is fevourable for the country and individual
To recapitulate, I personally aver that responsibility of the environmentally and socially shoul be taken by visitors because it is fruitful for humankind and the place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cook'?
Suggestion: cook
... essential time, folks do not prefer to cooking and cleaning at place. Instead, tripper...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3381294964 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88497281862 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.28823274 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849775720331 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257341316174 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320578946426 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643007284809 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437562920717 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.