Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, many people hold the view that unpaid community service should be encouraged and therefore made obligatory as a part of high school programmers. From my perspective, I agree with this statement.
The first point to bear in mind is that supporting the community is considered one of the primary responsibilities of a righteous and dutiful citizen. It is especially crucial to the youth in high schools who have just gained strong awareness and growing perception. Because there always exist poor and unfortunate people, society needs more and more energetic people who are willing to work for the sake of others. However, many people believe that children are too young to do voluntary work; meanwhile, adults are too busy with their work. Therefore, adolescents are considered suitable and competent enough to do unpaid community service. Furthermore, by encouraging high school students to do voluntary work, they would later develop their moralities as well as virtues.
Another point to mention is that doing unpaid community service is an invaluable experience. Doing voluntary work is indeed the opportunity to enhance some soft skills such as communication, time management, collaboration, leadership, initiative, and so on. Without a doubt, these skills are certainly a useful tool for high school students to get a well-paid job in the future. Moreover, by helping and interacting with people, adolescents would develop a great sense of confidence and self-esteem, thus resulting in a well-rounded development for high school students.
In conclusion, doing unpaid community service is an urgent duty of a righteous citizen. Besides, it is an invaluable experience that brings enormous benefits, both for the society and students themselves. Consequently, high school programs should include doing unpaid community service as a mandatory part.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47586206897 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0893164839 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0440992021 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321150165297 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102251727911 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546534377517 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196095544685 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177510752008 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.