There has been an increasing debate as to whether companies ought to highlight the quality of the products or the affordable expenditure to purchase them. From my perspective, the quality and the price of one product both are literally vital based on reliable instances and potent facts which all will be discussed further in this essay.
To embark upon, some are of the opinion that when it comes to producing a product the quality comes first based on two potent reasons. First of all, when people buy a product which is long-lasting, they could use it neatly and no matter if they buy a bit expensive however they are certain when they are using it especially when it comes to electronic devices. To cite an example, in 2015 General Motors Company bought all electronic devices such as pcs, wireless phones and printers from a well-known company nonetheless they are costly the company is sure about their all appliances no matter how long the employees work with them. Secondly and importantly, if people buy something which is not really good in quality, they should purchase that product again, moreover, they are always in a worrisome situation that maybe the product will be broken soon.
Having all said, others hold this viewpoint that all products have to be reasonably priced for the public to buy. Since every member of society is not financially secured therefore it is not really possible for them to buy high-quality products all the time. Take the care industry for instance, in the third world countries people cannot buy cars which are safe, high-tech or luxurious due to the fact that in developing countries such as India people’s budget do not fit to buy brand cars, consequently they go for substandard automobiles. Companies in unprivileged nations normally offer the same products with less acceptable functions. For example, as a citizen in these nations, you can have a phone but not the iPhone one you can have a car but not a Toyota one. To clear up things the vital issue in these countries is to produce something which is not really expensive thus most members of the society can purchase it.
To my estimation, I believe not only the price of the products but also the cost of them is crucial. In other words, companies whether in developed or developing countries ought to produce, products that are acceptable in both quality and fee. To encapsulate my latter viewpoint there are a number of Chinese companies which are really rich in producing high-quality appliances ranging from clothes to automobiles or smart devices.
By way of conclusion, I believe factories ought to consider both the products’ cost and quality. Although this viewpoint seems ideal, there are several companies all around the world that their products are both affordable and acceptable in traits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There has been an increasing debate as to whether companies ought to highlight the qualit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98728813559 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7070136702 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489406779661 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7349138587 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.470588235 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7647058824 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153093758613 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549083414875 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316347612276 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855717815149 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179285766201 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.