Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
agree or disagree?
Some people explicitly state that the amount of waste recycled from homes is not enough. They believe that governments should male some laws to increase the amount of home waste recycled. I completely agree with this point of view. I think that rules can force people to change the way they live, and make recycling the home wastes as a habit for present and future generations.
On the one hand, it is a well-established fact that if someone does not follow a rule, he or she should pay the forfeiture. In fact, the government can change people's behavior jus by making new legal requirements. People do not like to pay the forfeiture, so they decide to follow the rules. By having new rules about recycling of home wastes, all the people try to change the way of their living. Thus, the rules can increase the amount of recycling.
On the other hand, rules can lead people to a new habit. For example, if people recycle their wastes for a long time, it could become a new habit for them, and people do not recycle their waste anymore because of the rules. Also, This habit can be taught to children too. Therefore, this habit will become a habit for all the generation in the past and future.
In light of thoughts elaborated upon, I would like to conclude that making some new rules about recycling the home wastes by governments can be a good idea. I completely agree with this idea, and I believe it can increase the number of home wastes recycled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62595419847 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46439596651 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473282442748 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4391357925 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377778385023 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133390706031 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112775268832 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252477015031 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126698723995 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.