All around the world, people are producing more and more waste because of increasing standards of living. This is potential environmental catastrophe, but it can be mitigared by a number of steps, including recycling. In some countries, a governments have made recycling a legal requirenment, and I wholeheartedly endorse this position.
Firstly, while it is important that a government gives its citizens freedom, it is clear that people are simply not taking responsobility for their actions in regards waste. Thet are numerous incentives that can be put in place. For instance, in Germany the supermarkets encourage people by buying a plastic or a glass bottle which they afterwards could easily put in special recycling machine and hereby get some money from this equipment just only for recycling bottles. Obviously, this requirenment will make contribution to a city and motivate people respeectively.
Secondly, the governments throughout the world must evolve a recycling facilities in every cities such as arrange separate bins for the wastes with neccessery instruction on it. Moreover, the local councils emphasize the importance to waste of goods and involving every citizens in recycling process. However, for expamle, in Swiss has time restriction of recycling products. The cities authorities set the schedule when the people may put the waste goods in the bins and only permissed wight must be downloaded in the trash. I think, this approach has a totaly negative impact on the environment due to this meassures contributes to eascalate waste.
In conclusion, i believe that a governments to implement laws mandating recycling by all people, without any doubt this ensure environmental prospority and everyone's future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
...including recycling. In some countries, a governments have made recycling a legal requirenmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tes to eascalate waste. In conclusion, i believe that a governments to implement...
^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
...e waste. In conclusion, i believe that a governments to implement laws mandating recycling b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46096654275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14355298135 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2543801856 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29355448294 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911568029097 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566458576446 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162932752683 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054707214533 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.