Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Health is considered as the most common issue in today’s world. Some experts found, in compared to those who lived in the pass, nowadays, the average of modern people’s ages decreased and become shorter due to various decrease and health problems. Some people think the most efficient way to counter such problem is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Meanwhile, other reckons that this is not the appropriate answer. This essay will highlight both arguments. Nevertheless, I personally believe that there are other ways that is worth considered to improve public health instead of providing sport facilities for public.
To begin with, according to some, providing extensive and well-facilities for sport will contribute to the improvement of healthy lifestyle of the society that will produce more healthy people in the country. The improvement of such facilities such as jogging tracks, public gyms, as well as various types of sport fields including footballs and basket balls, will somehow enable people to work out work out easily and freely without expanding amount of money for their healthy lifestyle.
Despite the above argument might be true, I believe there are other alternative methods to improve public health. For instance, governments could spend more financial support to improve the health centers and pharmacies as well as to low the taxes for health access. Such rules would undoubtedly assist the citizens to become healthy, particularly for those who come from low economic background. In addition, governments could also set some regulation for reducing the distribution of unhealthy food that causes it is consumers multiple kinds of diseases such cancer and livers.
In conclusion, it is clear that in order to increase public health government should not only pay attention in enhancing public sport facilities. In fact, there are many ways to do so such as improving health care center, lowing the payment for health access and medicines, or reducing the distribution of junk foods in the city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered improving'.
Suggestion: considered improving
...that there are other ways that is worth considered to improve public health instead of providing spor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'work out'.
Suggestion: work out
...et balls, will somehow enable people to work out work out easily and freely without expanding amo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n in enhancing public sport facilities. In fact, there are many ways to do so such...
^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...distribution of junk foods in the city.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79195520208 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1256651397 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276330497102 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104759867837 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674648342004 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179166731148 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789687521898 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.