Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree
One of the most controversial issues today relates to news updates from various media. It is often advocated that traditional newspapers and periodicals will be entirely replaced by Ebooks and contemporary technologies. Personally, I vehemently agree with this view.
One point in favor of Ebooks and cutting-edge technology is that it is fairly handy for users. First and foremost, free newspapers and periodicals are available almost every day from a variety of sources and citizens can discover them quickly and effortlessly. One good illustration of this is that citizens can use google or Facebook and other social media sites to search for newspapers or magazines that they want to read lead to broaden their scope of general knowledge. Furthermore, the majority’s core daily routine would be reading news, giving rise to received countless recognitions from netizens for reading news in the media. Hence, traditional newspapers and magazines would not derive the benefit from the optimal news and quickly like Ebooks and modern technology.
A fact to support is that contemporary technology cultivated an excessive amount of tools and good quality, consequently, it saves the time of inhabitants. Likewise, people can acquire up-to-date information anywhere in the globe at any time and anywhere. Moreover, netizens have the right to judge the quality and accuracy of the news when there are inefficiencies in specific news. For instance, in the BBC application, people usually catch some articles containing useful reviews and suggestions by the reader before. As a result, people can use it fairly conveniently when it provides accurate and fast news but traditional newspapers and magazines do not have.
To reiterate, I once again reaffirm my position that newspapers and magazines would be altered by Ebooks and contemporary technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, moreover, so, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48780487805 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08795734771 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.131645944 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213049117101 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720284179868 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674070756522 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126124243983 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178688113456 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.