Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is often said that children benefit from learning history. However, some people might argue that science and technology are more vital subjects than history, especially in today's technology-focused world. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support putting history in the curriculum of children cite various benefits that history can bring to a child. This range about revolution events and famous people, who changed the world as we know it. The expert argues that we cannot ignore the importance of knowing about the past to create a better future, for example, the presence of the smart car today is the result of the constant effort the person who invented wheels around 3800 B.C, which had a fundamental impact on transfer and agriculture industry.
On the other hand, the opponents of the debate have a convincing reason that sciences and technology are more vital subject than history. We are living in the digital era which technology improver faster than before and children must be prepared for future development, the result of a study which accomplished in Europe indicated that, if people were upgraded their abilities, they would find a good job with great income in future, for example, the tools for simple surgery are changing every day if you are surgeon and you are expert in your position but you couldn’t work with new facilities then you will feel Job insecurity.
Overall, it seems advisable that the decision to focus on science and technology in children's education, rather than on a general view that says History is one of the most important school subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...erson who invented wheels around 3800 B.C, which had a fundamental impact on tran...
^
Line 9, column 425, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...would find a good job with great income in future, for example, the tools for simple surg...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08394160584 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63883504037 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616788321168 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.827745131 49.4020404114 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.777777778 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314196767432 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126475726904 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106310450336 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19904526283 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987760428523 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.