In recent year, because of the revolutionary advancement in modern technology, most people agree to focus in some issues such as science and technology in the school curriculum instead of paying attention to history that is the others’ priority. I will explain my opinion, which is admitted the latter view.
On the one side, technology has become inalienable part of human’s life in modern era. Therefore, having information about technology and science might be critical, especially for students who would be encountered with a variety of up to the minute equipment. Also, this opportunity prepares them to invent and make an effort for building a more suitable world. However, implementing history helps them to use the technology in the right way with regard to this issue that learning about the past often gives a glimpse of future.
Turning to the other side of this story tells us that history and culture are the foundation of the society and informing students about them is fundamental. Firstly, the society who knows about its culture would not be recurred the previous mistakes that their older generations had done. Secondly, history gives students right set of circumstances to applied experiences in their lives. As an example, Japanese students have a world’s history course, which is known as gold course because their teachers believe that after entering this course to school curriculum since 1980, the development in their country has a significant effectiveness.
In conclusion, although science and technology play an important role in children’s future as a strong tool for inventing and making world a convenient place for living, I believe history would change the future generation toward more experienced people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36823104693 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96959881443 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9676636776 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204347015854 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706956163984 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522093194085 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129219214651 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430631791836 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.