Some people say music can connect people in different cultures and ages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The purpose of music is to facilitate communication between humans. Thus, music has the potential to bring people together regardless of their cultures or ages. From my perspective, I totally agree with this statement.
Music can help people comprehend others despite their cultures. Providing they have the same zest for music, they can understand and interact with the person next to them, though they are different in nationality or mother tongue. A modern music festival like Tomorrowland, for example, draws thousands of participants from all over the world, making strangers friends because they share a common interest in digital music. As a result, more people are taking part in this annual and international event to make new friends and dance together to the astounding melody. In this case, race or language become second to the love of music.
Aside from culture, this essay believes that music plays a key role in bringing people from different generations together. Youth, the elderly, and even adults can show their enthusiasm for music for some specific things, especially citizens of a country. Take the national anthem as an example. The song inspires a feeling of patriotic pride among natives, who sing along to it and feel patriotic about the nation they live in. Moreover, other types of music like folks are used to bridge the gap between parents and their descendants, as they are lessons that former people want to teach their heirs.
In conclusion, all types of music are clearly capable of uniting people. While contemporary music erases the difference in cultures, traditional helps remove distance in ages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21886792453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65549934161 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9644306925 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218982893166 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074563420482 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533353529355 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136953153802 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313606998622 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.