Some people say that no one should do the same job forever, while others believe that doing the same job is beneficial for the individual, company and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Indubitably, job plays a salient role in someone's individual life in order to survive. Some citizens say that no one should same work lifetime, while the remaining group of thinkers believe that doing the same job is advantageous for a person, organization, and society. This essay will critique both aspects and give pertinent reasons in the ensuing paragraphs, my opinion will be highlighted before reaching reasonable conclusion.
To begin with, changing jobs would fruitful in various ways, there are two rudimentary reasons behind this consequence. Firstly attaining various companies would be advantageous. person can get enormous experience in order to working in various projects, hence, by changing companies person can understand which types of work he can do more productively. For example, a person is working in IT company, having an experience one should can complete task in a limited number of hours. Secondly, a person can think out of the box and enlarge his thinking through changing job after several years, in this way person can not only extent his thinking abilities but also become earn handsome cash, it would be adventurous while adapting various projects, a person becomes a billionaire. To Exemplify, one person left company and start his own statup, by far, startup became successful and borrow immense funds from lenders. Moreover, an individual becomes a rich in short time of period through his startup's IPO.
On the flipside, Despite being in same organization would be beneficial in two basic ways. Firstly, it is more than effective in order to survive in life, if someone loyal to his company, it would be worthwhile not for him but also for his family. Additionally, someone gets a promotion and gets increment through the same job in same organization. For example, person becomes a CEO after working in same company and gets a gigantic salary package owing to work as same post. Secondly, it would be helpful for his health while doing same at same place, person can pay his bills and rent, henceforth, it would be less stressful, in result one can be physically strong.
In conclusion, I recapitulate that although having same job would not be safe for his health but also for his family, attending diffrent work has a plethora of benefits. I opine that changing Projects has colossal merits rather than being in same job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Person
...arious companies would be advantageous. person can get enormous experience in order to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09768637532 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79011393323 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539845758355 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5869592135 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.647058824 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263866407203 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974328239272 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876082202748 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198638716415 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924498305837 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.