The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Environmental hurdles always become major concerns since the later part of the 1990s. Some masses believe that the easiest way to solve environmental problems by gaining the price of fossil fuel. I partly agree with this notion and this essay will critique the opt solutions with pertinent examples before forming my reasonable conclusion.
Environmental problems have been increasing through myriad consequences. Firstly the enormous consumption of oil and gas by transportation vehicles due to the dramatic increase in cars and heavy vehicles. Additionally, huge machinery operated in maximum industries operated by petrol. For example, in the USA significant number of bourgeois tend to use the car rather than bike moreover major companies like Facebook run his servers through diesel generators, therefore, surge pollution, despite being used of petrol it not right decision to boost the price of fuel because the higher price of fuel will indirectly influence the price of goods in the market through the increasing wage of transportation. Finally, this will burden the people and limit their freedom. Unfortunately, the growth of oil and gas price will create new problems.
On the flip side, fuel has become detrimental to the environment though there are a plethora of solutions that are available in order to mitigate this hurdle. Firstly, common people can use natural resources operated vehicles. For example, they should use electric cars which are charged by solar panels rather than diesel cars. Similarly, big industries should use hydro fuel operated generators hence it would be not fruitful for people but also beneficial for the environment. Finally, extending the charge of fuels is not mandatory for increasing environmental problems.
In conclusion, I recapitulate that although a hike in fuel price will not be an optimal solution for alleviating environmental problems, I opted that other precautions would be helpful to decrease this obstacle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...his notion and this essay will critique the opt solutions with pertinent examples befor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...on, despite being used of petrol it not right decision to boost the price of fuel bec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50986842105 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98336040697 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.215340139 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23409451842 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783074727397 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691871090949 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14921324469 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667909263253 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.