Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is certainly true that group work can learn a plethora of skills for life rather than activities which are being done by individuals. I partly agree with this notion and this will critique both views with pertinent reasons before forming my reasonable conclusion.
To commence, working in a group is beneficial in several ways. Firstly, it is more convenient than those who tend to work alone.
To exemplify, a computer engineer works in a multinational software company with his more than ten colleagues, and they work in a team, henceforth, the task will be divided and each employee has a different task, in this way, they will not only mitigate loads of task but also task will complete in the timeline. Besides this company would be able to not only accomplish enormous projects but also will earn handsome money.
completing projects on time every employee can gain immense experience also they will learn fruitful life skills.
on the flip side, despite having a group work person has enlarged his ability, however, working as individually has his own benefits. In order to work alone, a person can do work with more focus and accurately. For example, software developers can also work at home in such an emergency situation, thus one can tackle the hurdle more appropriately. Moreover, an individual can not only boost his work skill but also broaden the horizon of his mind. Additionally, one can think out of the box.
In conclusion, I recapitulate that although working in a team is advantageous in some ways, doing work as alone not only increases decision-making skill but also develop dealing skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Completing
...cts but also will earn handsome money. completing projects on time every employee can gai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...hey will learn fruitful life skills. on the flip side, despite having a group w...
^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g skill but also develop dealing skill.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0073800738 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80173691038 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9148635041 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173029640418 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690282560463 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690846862431 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931175613903 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506597423097 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.