Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways, others say it is good for children to get knowledge. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over recent years, it can be observed that television serves as the major source for information gain among children who are unaware of using internet. Few people argue that allowing children to watch tv might have negative effects, while others are of the opinion that it helps children in gaining knowledge. Both sides of the argument present rational ideas, which will be elaborated.
On the one hand, some people believe that children should be allowed to watch TV for various reasons. First and foremost, they help children to be updated in current affairs. To illustrate, media shows all kinds of global news which helps children to understand what’s going on in society and the various advancements that are being made. Secondly, visual representations have a great impact, and this makes learning easier. For example, as we are aware of the famous quote “pictures speak louder than words”, by watching movies they can learn and understand languages easily.
On the other hand, many people point out that the disadvantages of watching TV outweigh the advantages. One of the major concern among the people who doesn’t support watching tv is child’s health. They believe that allowing children to watch television from the very young age might impact their eyesight. These days children of 10 years age group are also wearing spectacles which was not common in the past. Also, children may get addicted to watch television and therefore refuse to go out and play with their fellow. Sitting at one place and watching tv for hours makes them weak due to lack of physical activities. In addition to this, children might tend to practice what they see. For example, watching their favourite superhero jump off a building or fighting goons may inspire them to try these stunts which might have adverse effects.
In conclusion, although I agree that TV provides children with knowledge, I believe there are more drawbacks when compared to benefits. In order to lower the negative effects, parents should take responsibility by limiting the amount of time children watch TV. Moreover, parents should try to make sure that children watch TV under their supervision and only few channels should be accessible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17679558011 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69095939708 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577348066298 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7756604192 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6315789474 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302349630227 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973025520838 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632983675865 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194174363406 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288916845162 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.