Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from Walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains are irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance the given topic asserts that development of agriculture; is it beneficial the production of crops through scientific method or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with examples and illustration shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people Who believe that development of farming and scientific way is the better way to production of vegetables and fruits. They strengthen their view point by claiming that, firstly, in the modern scenario, the cuisines were manufactured used to chemical for growing.secondly, in the previous time farmers used to in- organic composition and soil fertility is rich than nowadays. Especially, they have no fulfilled requirement of people without organic farming.whereas, last but not leats, population is grown up. So that is reason farmer affection towards growing crops for scientific way so, it is the best way to fulfill demand of individuals. The best epitome of this is India has been developed of farming through artificial technique. It helps to production of food and incline the economy of nation.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that the scientific method is not the best way for growing crops.first, it is true, because that way surge up numerous disease for mankind. The factory farming have inclined a growth of economy and business. They were used to harmful pesticides for germinate crops. In the contemporary era, secondly, the women and men suffer from Stone, kidney failure diseases. It is bad impact on the health of human beings. Finally, the fertility of soil was loss day by day by using pesticides on the land. The best epitome of this is China was consumed chemicals and scientific way for manufacture crops. It used to ton of plastic in the crops so, that is wrong way to incline diseases.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing the both options; there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap require use of both hands therefore undoubtedly, it is the best way to manufactured cuisine by scientific creation for fulfill demand of people. But although, the hazardous pesticides used to higher production and gain a quite few of economy but, it is destroyed the natural environment; inclination disease, poor soil fertility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tific method or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'day by'.
Suggestion: day by
...Finally, the fertility of soil was loss day by day by using pesticides on the land. The best ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lination disease, poor soil fertility.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 431.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06032482599 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96297786658 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524361948956 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5672372437 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107644822086 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308815799004 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352594433379 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066759030541 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174521052221 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.