Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from Walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains are irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance the given topic asserts that development of agriculture; is it beneficial the production of crops through scientific method or not? Through this essay seeks to investigate followed by my own perception.
On the one hand, there are a plethora of advantages to support the former groups perspective. First and perhaps the most lucrative point is that development of farming and scientific way is the better way to production of vegetables and fruits. They strengthen their view point by claiming that, firstly, in the modern scenario, the cuisines were manufactured used to chemical for growing.secondly, in the previous time farmers used to in- organic composition and soil fertility is rich than nowadays. Especially, they have no fulfilled requirement of people without organic farming.whereas, last but not leats, population is grown up. So that is reason farmer affection towards growing crops for scientific way so, it is the best way to fulfill demand of individuals. The best epitome of this is India has been developed of farming through artificial technique. It helps to production of food and incline the economy of nation.
Contrary to this, the latter group claim that the scientific method is not the best way for growing crops.first, it is true, because that way surge up numerous disease for mankind. The factory farming have inclined a growth of economy and business. They were used to harmful pesticides for germinate crops. In the contemporary era, secondly, the women and men suffer from Stone, kidney failure diseases. It is bad impact on the health of human beings. Finally, the fertility of soil was loss day by day by using pesticides on the land. The best epitome of this is China was consumed chemicals and scientific way for manufacture crops. It used to ton of plastic in the crops so, that is wrong way to incline diseases.
To recapitulate, weighing the both options; there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap require use of both hands therefore undoubtedly, it is the best way to manufactured cuisine by scientific creation for fulfill demand of people. But although, the hazardous pesticides used to higher production and gain a quite few of economy but, it is destroyed the natural environment; inclination disease, poor soil fertility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...ora of advantages to support the former groups perspective. First and perhaps the most...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Contrary to this, the latter group claim that the scientific method is not the be...
^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'day by'.
Suggestion: day by
...Finally, the fertility of soil was loss day by day by using pesticides on the land. The best ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lination disease, poor soil fertility.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15439429929 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0253469647 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53919239905 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8124206817 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6363636364 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998294257819 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281324425653 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324686763481 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620306606247 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206314745247 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.