Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
The statement says the two different opinions of people about the subject selection independency for university students.
Restricting students interests and doing so depends on various factors, where some of them have been discussed in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, when considering the view of people who say that students should study whatever they like, it sounds more maverick. Today, students being more mature wants to choose what they want and what they don't want. Analysing this, advantages are superior than disadvantages in this case. One of the major advantages of this view is the interest of students. Students will obviously develop interest in what they like rather than in something being forced into them. One of the important disadvantages would be with students who are not so contemplative and who fail to decide the correct future for them. But this again is questionable, as they too might not develop interest in some program they are not sure about.
Secondly, coming to the other view of people, useful subjects in the future depends on particular individual's views. For instance, one wants to pursue degree in music and music is not so advisable in that region or locality. He might excel in it and reach top-level in it by working in an area which has high-demand for music, rather than failing to develop interest and reach high level in the subject that he don't like. The advantage with this view is with only one who are free of decisions.
The word 'useful' in the statement arises question.What is the meaning of useful here? Does 'useful' mean salary or does that mean pride? If salary is meant, then one should pursue subject that will gain him high-salaried job. But, what if he wants a normal life free of rush. Same is the case with pride, what if the student don't want a particular subject that is treated with great respect in his locality. So, this impulses us to arise many questions. To conclude, with the view of letting students decide, its disadvantage mentioned above can be rectified if the high schools teach them and make them open to various opportunities available. Considering the view of forcing subjects, I don't prefer that as the development of own interest will only make them excel in that subject they select. So, I completely agree with the people's opinion of letting the university students decide the future and the subject they want to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to choose what they want and what they dont want. Analysing this, advantages are su...
^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...Analysing this, advantages are superior than disadvantages in this case. One of the ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reach high level in the subject that he dont like. The advantage with this view is w...
^^^^
Line 8, column 50, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
...useful in the statement arises question.What is the meaning of useful here? Does use...
^^^^
Line 8, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he case with pride, what if the student dont want a particular subject that is treat...
^^^^
Line 8, column 687, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...idering the view of forcing subjects, I dont prefer that as the development of own i...
^^^^
Line 8, column 826, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...select. So, I completely agree with the peoples opinion of letting the university stude...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93366093366 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64011287957 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4914004914 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.590298275 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2727272727 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95454545455 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253933007394 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744926123506 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660797259853 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126595391224 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747140125852 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.