Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecturer completely contradicts the views of the author of the reading passage. The professor indicates the following points to indicate that close study on altruistic behavior of animals and humans has shown that they are not always unselfish and sacrificial.
Meerkats are not considered altruistic by the lecturer due to following two reasons.
First, eventhough a meerkat acts as sentinels while other meerkats hunt for food, as they eat before the other food-searching meerkats, they are full strong to guard and look out for predators.
Second, they will be the first to escape due to two resasos. One is that, sentinals will be near a burrow when they guard. Other reason is that, the other meerkats will get the attention of the predator more than sentinals as they will gather or move about to defend themselves immediately after the alarming cry alerts by sentinals.
Human's altruistic character is refuted by the lecturer as well. The lecturer supports his position by pointing out the appreciation a person will receive whne he does altruistic acts such as donating organs even to strangers. Increase in self-worth and some people who value non-material rewards more are posed as reasons for her opinion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1959798995 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76585580506 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618090452261 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3596486859 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114118713673 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469547890241 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377333756093 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570639368206 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450918881579 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.