Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the benefits of professor giving talk on television. Whereas the lecturer suggests that neither professors, universities nor public benefits from the appearance of professors as guests on television news programs, the author of reading states that such appearances provide great advantage to all three of them. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to reading professors get known as experts in their respective fields among large number of people unlike publishing in journals that results in only the scholars of their field being aware of the professor. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that their appearance does not create a good impression on other professors. They see him as someone who entertains, as a result the professor is not encouraged for attending conferences. Furthermore, she also mentions that it is difficult for the professor to carry out research.
Secondly, the reading states that universities’ name gets to be known by many people, it receives name and fame. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that such appearance consumes professor’s time, it takes time to think- what to present, rehearse, travel and look good. Thus, the professor cannot dedicate sufficient time to teach his students and for university’s tasks.
Finally, the reading claims that public gains knowledge. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that network does not want in depth knowledge. It only needs academic title and brief historical invention. Moreover, she feels that this can be provided through simple Television viewer who has done a little research.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the impacts of professor appearing on television programs, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gains'' or 'gain's'?
Suggestion: gains'; gain's
...Finally, the reading claims that public gains knowledge. On the other hand, the lectu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49671052632 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96549291003 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.8441198508 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2941176471 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137285118734 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478176842479 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065849207764 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088351627101 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582990661274 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.