Many people believe that the best way to improve road safety is to raise the minimum legal age for driving. Although raising the minimum legal age is an effective way, I don't think it is the best manner to solve traffic safety problems.
Firstly, although increase the minimum legal age for driving can alleviate road traffic accidents, there are many other reasons leading to traffic accidents. Even if we use this method, it still can not be solved completely. To begin with, drunk driving is an important cause of traffic accidents. People of any age have the possibility of drinking. Compared with younger people, mature people are more likely to drink and drive. From this point of view, only raising the minimum legal age for driving can not solve these traffic problems. Besides, fatigue driving is also the main reason of traffic safety accidents. Excessive fatigue can make people feel sleepy. At this time, it is very easy to cause traffic accidents. Likewise, increasing the minimum legal driving age can not stop people from driving tiredly.
Secondly, there are some better ways to improve road safety. The government can do some propaganda to help people strengthen their sense of safety and recognize the serious consequences of wrong driving to solve the problem fundamentally. Moreover, the government also can strengthen infrastructure construction to provide effective guarantee for people's travel. This way is more effective and easier to implement.
There are many other ways to solve traffic safety problems, such as increasing investment in technology and making safer cars. These methods are very effective too. All in all, increasing the minimum legal age for driving cars and motorcycles not the best way to improve road safety.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...inimum legal age is an effective way, I dont think it is the best manner to solve tr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21126760563 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60544346469 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5685704433 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385210802662 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129447845495 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116769374001 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274116505784 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072516378771 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.