Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic accident, the danger causing agonized painful in society, is noticed by people directly or indirectly affected. Massive contrastive stances surrounding the solutions can deal with this problem; however, the numbers continually increase are still emerge on social media, and draw us anxiety. Highering the minimum age of driving traffic transport, the solution advocated by a part of the population, merely bring short-term effectiveness while the core of the problem remains, thus the root of the problem has no way to handle. Therefore, this essay refutes the perspective supporting the idea of lifting the lower limit of driving age.
On the one hand, the main reasons caused traffic accidents are the awareness of the people participating in transportation and the transportation infrastructure. Awareness varying from country to country, affected by history, cultural base determine the behavior by which indicate the safety-level of national transportation. Similar to awareness, transportation infrastructure differentiate in each country, essential factor triggering severe traffic problems, and decide the degree of transportation development in groups of the country. Researchers prove countries having the different unsafe reality of transportation fluctuating from the developing to developed. With the statistically significant results, the developing countries have higher in both amount and level of damages than the developed countries. Both regions have victims having ages fluctuating in the range from 26 to 55. Those results evidence that the conclusion asserting ages influencing the reality of traffic accident is unacceptable and unscientific.
On the other hand, lowering the minimum age-eligible to control traffic transport will constrain the developing ability of society in general and restrict the self-command ability of young generation, the futural owners of countries. In the era of the technological revolution, social thrive to an intense, unprecedented scale in which knowledge boost with enormous velocity and volume. Young people, the generation having the ability of high and fast awareness and modern perspective, suffering high pressure of new knowledge need to absorb information sooner to respond to the development. Driving, the basic and must know skills, is necessary training at a suitable age, and if young people can not expertly perform this straightforward and foundational technic, they fail to account for other complex works, and of course, cannot shoulder the social responsibility. In contrast, they demand to higher-qualified courses training driving skills with modern infrastructure and ordinal lessons and experience trainer. Governments should concentrate on education to update the awareness about safety transportation rather than practice a newly ineffective policy.
In conclusion, creating a new policy upping the minimum age is unnecessary and waste the national resources to practice law. Educational solutions improving awareness, ethic, and technical driving skills are reliable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2620.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95454545455 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30580193694 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9456285044 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.894736842 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113347152924 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334686540494 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271230170397 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760276548641 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287701413521 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 78.4519038076 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.