Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion
These days developing countries act as a significant role in the world’s order and their successful economic growth rate has been profited from the massive support of international communities. Many people suppose that third world countries need financial support from international communities, by contrast, others suppose the assistance as medical products, educational programs, consultancy are more essential. In my views, the assistance in the form of money shows less practical than other types of useful aid and consultancy.
On the one hand, I understand the reason for people who argue economic solutions are high performance for developing countries. With economic aid packages, governments can extend the scientific research in order to enhance the technological development and eventually foster the economic progress. However, third world countries are difficult to exercise external monetary flows efficiently because of the poor quality of infrastructure and labor force. Furthermore, administration systems of less developed countries do not have enough experience to fully utilized foreign cash injections.
On the other hand, I would side with those who believe other forms of assistance should be given. By restricted and limited resources, developing countries which cannot have the resolution for many concerning internal issues like poverty, crime, or unemployment. Therefore using specific measures in each field is the best solution. Experienced organizations provide experts in the fields of science, law, and medicine in order to encourage the development of developing countries. With useful consultancy, professional and systematic education and training programs from experts, human resources of third world countries can improve their own expertise and more practical and suitable in the context of developing nations.
In conclusion, owing to the aforementioned arguments, it seems to me that instead of monetarily assisting poor countries, global help should come in other forms such as advice and training courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astructure and labor force. Furthermore, administration systems of less developed...
^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ign cash injections. On the other hand, I would side with those who believe othe...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s like poverty, crime, or unemployment. Therefore using specific measures in each field i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90604026846 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17797105439 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8589726051 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.384615385 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220369787134 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696096761667 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399662951912 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124640529028 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535388376378 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.