It is argued that an all-time school schedule should be given to youngsters who are below the age of 18. While this suggestion might do wonders for students’ acquisition of knowledge, I maintain that this will lead to unnecessary pressure on students and deprive children’s right to fully enjoy their childhood.
On the one hand, the idea of offering ceaseless schooling will pave the way for children to comprehend the lessons more profoundly. With the increase in time spent at school, the students can participate in more educational activities that are useful for their comprehension of knowledge. For example, aside from attending classes about the theory of subjects such as physics or chemistry, students with full-time schooling can also have the chance to join several experimental classes where they can use their learned knowledge to utilize in the experiments.
On the other hand, the emergence of full-time education might engender unessential stress in young children. As their workloads at schools increase considerably, they will be overwhelmed with too much homework need to accomplish. Consequently, they will be seriously put under pressure and lose motivation and determination to study. Moreover, the deprivation of comprehensively getting the pleasure of childhood is another demerit of this academic curriculum. This is because young children are forced to study all the time, and they might not have much free time to hang out and play with their peers. As a result, they might miss out on a number of memorable and enjoyable memories in the early stage of their lifetime.
In conclusion, although giving a constant education will be beneficial for students’ cognitive development, I contend that its detrimental consequences on children’s mental growth are significantly more concerning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and determination to study. Moreover, the deprivation of comprehensively getti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4593639576 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13484723157 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3346184904 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11475620199 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047039181887 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413003330874 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707130856189 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144161082763 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.