In the last decades, the proportion of nations growing crops based on a genetic method has soared markedly in astounding ways. While some people insist that considering this type of technology proves exceedingly risky, i believe it remains an outright advancement. This essay will first discuss the shortcomings and secondly, the boons of altered products with relevant examples.
On the one hand, food allergies that have spiked significantly seem to be the key drawback of genetically reformed fruits and vegetables. Take tree nuts for an instance which triggered severe allergic reactions in kids because of the modified proteins that were found in the nuts in small amounts. As a consequence, the percentage of the affected pupils went up from 3.4 percent to 5.1 percent according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Centre. Next, the antibiotic resistance remains the worrisome issue as several studies have established an intimate connection between remodelled fruits and resistant bacteria. Since it is clear that these germs can make them tough to be destroyed, they can infect and kill at least 23,000 people a day as per the study.
However, i strongly believe that several benefits of genetically engineered crops play considerably key roles than unmodified foods. Cost efficient is one of the major plus points of well conceived foods, which means that the genetic manipulation has reduced the price of foods relatively. After all biologically transformed plants need far fewer pesticides and insecticides that often become the potential source of destruction of shrubs, the altered forms naturally remain insects resistant and have a prolonged shelf life as opposed to non modified counterparts. Secondly, the quality of foods is enhanced substantially because the mutated yields are loaded with specific nutrients which tend to erase the micronutrient deficiency and the supplements prove essential building blocks of human tissues. This ascertains why reorganised byproducts sound instrumental to human kinds from the economic and developmental point of view .
In conclusion, presumably, the advantages such as low price tags and complete maturation of human cells prevail any negative outcomes.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Next, the antibiotic resistance remains the worrisome issue as several studies have established an intimate connection between remodelled fruits and resistant bacteria.
Error: remodelled Suggestion: remodeled
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1854 1500
No. of Different Words: 232 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.437 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.906 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.357 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.388 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.524 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...of technology proves exceedingly risky, i believe it remains an outright advancem...
^
Line 5, column 931, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...economic and developmental point of view . In conclusion, presumably, the advan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, after all, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55131964809 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97725294319 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674486803519 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3246524534 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.214285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123581977903 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353395188222 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288036817535 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586865083468 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036764371371 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.