Some people think government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Certain masses reckon the bureaucrats funding should not be used for assisting art and culture. However, other asserts helping cultural activities may be beneficial for the public and the culture. I believe that authorities must provide a certain amount of funding to preserve and promote traditional activities as it plays a crucial role in boosting the country economy.
On the one hand, some people think that supporting cultural activities bring enormous positive merits in economic growth. Moreover, an abundant number of visitors especially international traveler's seem to have visited these sites. As a result, the country had experienced progression in every realm via foreign currency. Thus, preserving and promoting all these particular art and culture can bring significant positive changes throughout the nation. For instance, a recent survey by the United Nation Organization showed, about 90,000 international sightseers came to Nepal every year, due to which it had bought dramatically increased in Per Capita Income as well as Net National Income.
On the other hand, others disagree, instead of investing money on art and culture, they opine to support various developmental works. They feel this way because they see no major scope which can play a great influence on a livelihood. As a result, a few folks were seen involved in these activities. As an example, in recent days due to scarcity of craziness in such realm people seem to have less participation and overall such practice have been extinct. Consequently, the general public believes, it is a waste of money while spending on art and culture.
As such it could be concluded that investing a vast proportion of money on art and culture can bring a lot of merits rather than not spending fund to this realm bring untoward repercussions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ce have been extinct. Consequently, the general public believes, it is a waste of money while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166095407 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9884338878 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28272030732 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946983461653 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11304814079 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160668741541 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103669383773 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.