Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the modern life, the culture and the art has been rapidly developing. But that situation is different each countries. Some people believe that the government financing need not be used for assistant art and culture, others people think supporting cultural activities probably be helpful for the human and the culture. Nonetheless, those topics must talk nessesery.
If the government support department of the art and the culture, that county would know easy other country’s people and it is the best way to advertise that own country. Recently, people prefer to travel, so visitors are huge chance. Such as, everybody had not knew my country thirty years ago. But since many Mongolian guys participated some competition, world’s champion and Olympia, they could advertise name of Mongolia. Absolutely, Mongolian government helped finance and other important things.
In spite of, some country’s government does not still help and support art and culture. It is very mistake issues. If human of small countries advertise to use the internet their countries, more people of the world would know their countries without government’s supplies. Each countries has different especial culture. In my opinion, everybody should know culture of other countries.
Eventually, guys of modern became develop their country themselves power. Following this, population, city and country has been improving. But if I was the mayor, I would make investment a lot of for department of art and culture. Obviously, my country’s government did many work for those department. I think that it is not enough.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...huge chance. Such as, everybody had not knew my country thirty years ago. But since ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, world's champion and Olympia, they could advertise name of Mongolia. A...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...ies without government's supplies. Each countries has different especial cultur...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ernment's supplies. Each countries has different especial culture. In my opini...
^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun work seems to be countable; consider using: 'many works'.
Suggestion: many works
...ously, my country's government did many work for those department. I think that it i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this department' or 'those departments'?
Suggestion: this department; those departments
...try's government did many work for those department. I think that it is not enough.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...artment. I think that it is not enough.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, i think, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.496 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0131870171 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5194084856 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3157894737 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1578947368 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337145766076 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925259097577 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127844515485 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223159373985 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123758330986 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.73 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.