Some people think that the government should etablish free libraries in each town. Others, hoever believe that it is a waste of money since the public could use the Internet at home to obtain information. Discuss both side and give your own opinion.
It irrefutable that at the day and age, the development of technology enables residents to gain knowledge easily via the Internet. Therefore some individuals argue that it is unnecessary for the ubiquitous libraries. In my opinion, Libraries play an integral role that no other up-to-date devices could substitute, and it is better to take advantage of both modern websites and traditional libraries.
At this information age, the diversified advantages of using the Internet are too obvious. The news and knowledge could be obtained not only from all over the world but also be updated 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. On the contrary, conventional libraries can not provide up-to-minute information as fast as the modern internet. Besides, the Internet gives users the key to access complete multimedia experiences namely texts, videos, audios, graphics, etc all at once. These vivid experiences are expected to be a good idea to encourage the reader's curiosity and interest. Lastly, by just one simple click, users could be exposed to a new whole erudition freely, no matter when or where they are.
On the other hand, money spent on libraries is certainly worth it. Firstly, libraries usually use classified and apparent systems that allow librarians to locate specific information easily. Also, libraries provide a source of knowledge that is printed on paper, which might be more appropriate for some traditional readers, who always find it difficult to read news through small screens. Simultaneously, libraries provide a wide range of documents, which are verified and guaranteed by professionals, or even special collections date back many decades. Lastly, with the development of technology, modern libraries also offer some free internet connecting, creating opportunities for users to access any kind of knowledge.
To sum up, I strongly argue that libraries and the internet are complementing each other. Therefore, instead of closing libraries due to the drastic development of online information, the government should adjust some improvement to ensure libraries are useful and sustainable sources of knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...gain knowledge easily via the Internet. Therefore some individuals argue that it is unnec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
...cted to be a good idea to encourage the readers curiosity and interest. Lastly, by just...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, therefore, kind of, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44410876133 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0773651768 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619335347432 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8705559511 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232425190125 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727503401391 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432775739152 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140094720844 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272346648645 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.