Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us , but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion.
There are different perspectives about how to deal with history. A significant group of people believes that the history has no positive advantage or has deniable influence on human being's lifestyle. On the opposite side, some people think that study and understand the history can improve the culture of the society and the history is vital, important, and unseperatable part of each country. In the following paragraphs, I would argue about both views and dive into the history is necessary to save, teach, and develop in the world countries.
By and large, the most important disadvantage that I can point to, is reducing speed of the development in the countries by wasting more than logical time on it. For example, Brazil has a rich history, but in recent decades Brazilian people lived in difficult situation from economical and cultural aspects. they just look at the past and lost the present.
On the other hand, the history was helpful and influential in some countries like Italy, Spain, China, and Japan. this countries, use their historical buildings and stories to increase their economy level and attracting millions of international tourists in their countries. they can use this options as well as others. If a country want to become successful in all aspects like health, education, army, and economy should save, teach, understand, and use of historical and modern methods concurrency. Greece is a clear illustration for this idea. they can save their old heros and architectual feats and construct the professional cities and industries by using their experiences.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that the history is so important to all the countries, and it can use for a usable tool to improve the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...tage or has deniable influence on human beings lifestyle. On the opposite side, some p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...n from economical and cultural aspects. they just look at the past and lost the pres...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...es like Italy, Spain, China, and Japan. this countries, use their historical buildin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es like Italy, Spain, China, and Japan. this countries, use their historical buildin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ernational tourists in their countries. they can use this options as well as others....
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'methods'' or 'method's'?
Suggestion: methods'; method's
...stand, and use of historical and modern methods concurrency. Greece is a clear illustra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... is a clear illustration for this idea. they can save their old heros and architectu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well, for example, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06968641115 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84275291881 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8755594312 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220374526261 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692826671148 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772188299004 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125023448696 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982938905832 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.