some people think that imprisonment is not the best way to prevent crimes. Others, however, believe that providing offenders with education and training is less effective than putting them in prison.
Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
On a global scale, the issue of whether it is effective to keep lawbreakers in jail has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some people think educating violators is more important since it is the only way for them to change, while others argue that the punishment can deter crimes because people understand that there are serious consequences for their behaviours. This essay will discuss both points of view and give its own perspective.
It is necessary for offenders to accept education and behave legally in society. They will understand why they have broken the law and how can they solve the problem correctly since their behaviours lie in their mentality. For example, the crime rate has declined in China in recent decades, partly thanks to the education system conducted that allows wrongdoers to learn about legislation. In this case, those workshops play a significant role in preventing lawbreakers from breaking laws again.
Conversely, it is undeniable that strict punitive methods like imprisonment are deterrence on criminals. Without such a countability, laws and rules will be less powerful regarding to restricting people’s actions. Around the world, for instance, people think twice when their behaviours may breach any legislative documents because of the possibility of being captivated in prison for years. Thus, the long and unbearable imprisonment works effectively.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed whether offenders should be given educational opportunities because they need to learn how to behave, or put in jail because long sentences are deterring criminals. On balance, the essay believes that the former argument is stronger. Globally, the community will be much safer if all the residents, including wrongdoers, can be literate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, may, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44244604317 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95180873092 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629496402878 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9800295247 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197103489912 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597830793644 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496853016726 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112408061218 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698555522782 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.