Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of media
attention around the world due to its substantial impacts on human life.
Although the idea of coexistence between climate change and humans
appears reasonable, this cannot be viewed as the ultimate approach for
humankind to combat climate change.
There are a number of reasons why coexistence can do more harm than
good. First, climate change is largely shaped by human-caused
geoengineering rather than nature itself. For example, in order to produce
the energy that drives the world’s economy, most nations rely on carbon-
rich fuels like coal, oil, and gas, which directly correlates with the
intensification of global warming. Second, even if citizens agree to keep the
environment the way it is, corporations, especially in the manufacturing and
mining industries, would not as that would affect their profits. Therefore, it
can be implied that if corporations were not held accountable for their
contribution to global warming as in the case of coexistence, the issue of
climate change would inevitably be exacerbated.
It is more economically sound to actively prevent climate change than to
ignore it. In fact, the costs, either financial or non-financial, of dealing with
future consequences of climate change can be overwhelming. For instance,
the increase in intensity and frequency of storms can cause massive
destructions and deaths in many coastal areas, which would take decades
to recover. In addition, rising temperatures have also contributed to the
extinction of species worldwide. It should be noted that the extinction is
irreversible and comes at a great cost to the ecosystem and apparently
humans living within it.
In conclusion, actively combating global warming must be regarded as a top
priority given the high urgency. Governments and corporations worldwide
should take steps to ensure that climate change remains at bay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Intensification
..., which directly correlates with the intensification of global warming. Second, even if citi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56953642384 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0421796862 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.805099529 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 28.0 4.38176352705 639% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132911068992 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460739687096 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385548989406 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335746714206 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416518721403 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.