Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Other think than it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Other think than it is better to produce these locally.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is considered by some people that for a state's civilization it is momentous to introduce outlandish cinema as well as TV programmes whilst other disagree and think that locally television broadcasting are better. There are valid opinions on both sides, which l will consider now.

On the one hand, some people feel that to introduce outlandish culture via TV which can help to recognise about others states is more useful. This is important for broaden inhabitant's horizon about foreign traditional culture. For instance, a large majority of youngsters interested in others lifestyle and learn their languages such as Korean, English, Turkish, Russian and other. And foreign movies help them in spiritual development at an important stage.

On the other hand, though one major benefit of local movie and TV programmes are that being in full in their native traditional cultivation as well as bring example to their life only on the strength of their country's culture. This can lead to them develop theirs own, but also separate from world's news and theirs mentalism.

Talking everything into account, l feel that the best way is that keep balance between foreign and local movies in television broadcasting, because it gives a wide range to choose from, to ensure their interest is high.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...is considered by some people that for a states civilization it is momentous to introdu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al development at an important stage. On the other hand, though one major bene...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17061611374 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70658855698 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3649274504 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280743581491 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105584313534 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678692552725 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157115321321 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784220437653 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.