Some people think that it is more beneficial to takepart in sports which are played in teams, like football,while other people think that taking part in individualsports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss bothviews and give your own opinion.

It is a great flourished fact that nowadays people are becoming more concerned towards sports. Directly or indirectly, it will direct towards nation growth and development in a far more positive way along with the benefits of physical fitness of a sportsman. Physical workout includes good health, more stamina, more positivist, activeness, and more fitness or strength to a person.

Taking participation in sports in teams or on a individual level, it is not much important. Important is to indulge in sports. Sports participation as a team or as an individual, both aspects will nourish or thrive a sportsperson. Taking part in individual sports, like tennis, swimming, badminton, will enhance a person's confidence level, ability, self dependency and sportsmanship on an individual level. Firstly, he will not feel dependency factor and secondly, he will get more attention, time and expertise of a coach. He will become more self oriented towards his/her goals without interference of other players.

While on the other hand, playing with team mates could be more valuable, learn-able, and enjoyable, because sometimes we get to learn a lot from our teammates also. It also increase or enhance the feeling of brotherhood among the players. Many sports like football, hockey, cricket, handball and many other games are worldwide popular. Such type of sports increase the mutual understanding, sportsmanship and respect among the players.

According to my opine, both ways of sports are quiet good and far better than each other because both fields will give a bright future. For example- if someone's performance is not good in a cricket match but yet that team win the match, he/she will still get benefit or profit in a different ways. But if an individual sportsman loss the match, he is gonna to lose it completely and will not be able to get any type of positive remarks or benefit.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... participation in sports in teams or on a individual level, it is not much import...
^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...is, swimming, badminton, will enhance a persons confidence level, ability, self depende...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e get to learn a lot from our teammates also. It also increase or enhance the feelin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
... a lot from our teammates also. It also increase or enhance the feeling of brotherhood a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...ll get benefit or profit in a different ways. But if an individual sportsman loss th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16181229773 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89999781505 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5247834771 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138916927601 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449837062985 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385621275309 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797290725241 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242354282235 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.