Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that men and women are born with biological differences which determine which jobs suit them. While there are a variety of grounds supporting this view in the past, I disagree with the idea that this is still reasonable to the world of work today.
On the one hand, it used to be thought that men and women have physical distinctions which have a certain impact on the range of jobs opening to them, and affect their choice of careers. First, when most work was performed manually, men were advised to occupy positions in physically demanding jobs such as working on construction sites or driving heavy trucks, whereas pre-school teaching or nursing was more suitable for women. This view stemmed from the general idea that women are less strong and more dexterous than men. Second, the traditional stereotype of what so-called men or women jobs also directed them to ignore jobs which are supposed to suit only their counterpart.
On the other hand, the workplace has changed dramatically, which provides men and women with equal opportunities in all careers. The equality derives from the increasingly equal educational system, which assists women in gaining qualifications to undertake perfectly so-called men jobs and vice versa. Provided that they work hard, they deserve the opportunity to reach the top in their chosen field. More importantly, the more modern outlook has broken traditional barriers which prevent men or women from doing certain jobs in the past. It is, hence, hardly surprising that a growing number of women are able to join army force with the strong support from their families or friends.
In conclusion, the effect of gender difference on choosing a job to pursue for both men and women are constantly lessened in the modern workforce.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...tunity to reach the top in their chosen field. More importantly, the more modern outl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, second, so, still, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07118644068 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6466653907 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7200601182 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348510269906 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126372793606 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786955196012 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211983624854 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440802326963 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.