Some people believe governments should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
People have distinctive perspectives about whether the government should spend more money on building more and wider roads or constructing train and subway networks. While improving road systems could be beneficial to some extent, I would argue that it is better to invest more in train and subway networks.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why building more and wider roads could alleviate traffic jams. First, since the existing roads in some major cities have insufficient capacity to cope with the rapid increase in the number of cars, authorities need to broaden these roads so as to allow vehicles to move more easily. For example, by widening main roads, the capital of Vietnam, Hanoi, can lessen inner-city traffic congestion which used to be extremely serious during rush hours. Second, building a new road provides citizens alternative ways to reach their destinations. This will reduce traffic pressure on main roads where traffic jams often take place.
On the other hand, I believe that the construction of public transport including rail and subway lines could be a more effective and sustainable method. It is apparent that many people will be encouraged to use public transport because the speed of trains or the subway is usually way faster than private vehicles. This ultimately restrains the growth of private vehicles on the roads which is the main cause of traffic congestion. Additionally, as many cities do not have enough land to build new roads or broadening roads, underground subway networks are the best available option. This means of transport can carry a huge number of passengers without occupying much land.
In conclusion, building more roads and wider roads might have some advantages, I do believe that train and subway systems are the best method to tackle traffic congestion, especially in the cities where lack land to improve road systems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...authorities need to broaden these roads so as to allow vehicles to move more easily. For...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17915309446 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63224028131 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5752190529 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376898574979 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131193723889 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085467005943 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241724309714 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455725067099 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.