Some people believe governments should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Some would argue that constructing lines of trains and subways could cut down the traffic, while others believe that this can be curbed with wider and more roads. building the former alternatives would bring down the traffic dramatically but the latter idea could be useful at places where trains and subways are not possible to build. I desperately feel that having broad roads could only resolve the traffic issue to a certain point but, if it is combined along with trains and tubes or other alternatives there won't be any future congestions in traffic.
To begin with, with the advent of vehicles like cars and two-wheelers every person now has a bike or a car and commutes to work or anywhere through own vehicles which are causing the congestion on roads every day and it is increasing rapidly. Moreover, narrow roads making it difficult to cross through leading to one big jam. Third world countries are great examples of this problem. Indian cities such as Mumbai and Delhi are the major places where transport is difficult than everywhere else. Although, metro trains are available in these cities traffic is unchanged due to poor roads and routes. Attention should be kept turned to these issues.
Broader roads could solve these predicaments despite the fact that there are uncontrollable vehicles. Allowing people to understand the importance of using public transport could bring down these problems. For example, In Hyderabad, a city in India faced a terrible reduction in traffic after introducing metro for more than 100 kilometers which is noteworthy even though it had broad roads when compared to other places it is the metro which tackled the issue. Thus, having both metro lanes and wider routes is the best solution for treating traffic
In conclusion, each facility has it's own limitations such as route or availability but if combined with connecting lanes and shuttling services that could connect vehicle commuters with these lanes could be a great idea to solve traffic congestions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Building
...an be curbed with wider and more roads. building the former alternatives would bring dow...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the best solution for treating traffic In conclusion, each facility has its own...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, third, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11782477341 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58958387267 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577039274924 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.7117632932 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189459596759 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065856781976 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631219466866 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108645077851 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080802080207 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.