Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops, and on public transport.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that prohibiting the usage of smartphones in public destinations is crucial. While I concur with this statement, I also believe that phones can be used in some certain circumstances.
To begin with, it is comprehensible why smartphones should be forbidden in communal places. One of the foremost justifications is that they can prevent people from interacting with each other because people will have a tendency to get access to social networking sites. This will lead to the reduction in people’s face-to-face communication. Another compelling reason is human disturbance. In other words, it can be clearly noticed that in libraries, or on public vehicles for example, there are some individuals who dare to answer the phone loudly, or turn it into noise mode which can distract other people.
However, I am of the opinion that governments could impose some restrictions on these mobile devices instead of fully banning them. First and foremost, in public zones, users could use their phones for different purposes in silent or vibrate mode in order not to disturb, and interrupt other people’s activity. In addition to this, cell phones will be really beneficial in case of emergency such as accidents, robberies, etc. Moreover, besides reading books, phones can be helpful in providing their owners with entertainments when travelling on tedious long journeys, especially on public transport like underground.
In conclusion, although it is believed that people are not at liberty to use mobile phones indiscriminately in social places, they could be allowable in some particular situations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40711462451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10787072974 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5507030294 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9166666667 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246599438147 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816326303469 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411059452004 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151026880297 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351090651452 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.