In the past, people used to travel to see the differences from their home country. However, the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays.
What are the causes of these similarities? Do you think that the advantages of these similarities outweigh the disadvantages?
In previous times, visitors used to prefer travelling to other foreign regions in order to have different experiences; however, it is true that there is hardly any difference between the sights all over the world. In my opinion, there are some rationales behind this trend, and I also believe that its drawbacks are much more significant than its benefits.
To begin with, this pattern can be attributed to some compelling reasons. One of the foremost justifications is that national governments tend to attract travellers by renovating cities, places of interest so as to resemble famous destination places. This will play a short-lived role in boosting tourism of a nation . For example, ancient Chinese towns will be built as a tourist destination for visitors who are interested in Chinese culture. Another important factor is because of the cooperation and subsidization of other international tourism enterprises worldwide. Specifically, as these mother organizations have widely distributed their subsidiaries to other countries, similar method of improvements,and renovation will be implemented to many places, and leading to this similarity.
From my perspective, I am of the view that the advantages will soon be outweighed by some potential disadvantages. First of all, on global level, having the same destinations would create boredom among travellers due to the lack of regions’ novelty and characteristics. Thus, it will have a detrimental effect on the image as well as the profile of the countries. Furthermore, this resemblance is partly to blame for the disappearance of some traditions of each nation as it copies other cultures. As a matter of fact, more and more cultural values would gradually wipe out.
In conclusion, I think that those aforementioned reasons can cause this issue to happen, and I am convinced that the positive impacts would pale in comparison with the negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avellers by renovating cities, places of interest so as to resemble famous destin...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... renovating cities, places of interest so as to resemble famous destination places. Thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ved role in boosting tourism of a nation . For example, ancient Chinese towns will...
^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ountries, similar method of improvements,and renovation will be implemented to many ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y perspective, I am of the view that the advantages will soon be outweighed by so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27730718364 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0716408401 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6428571429 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942341833377 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256428751073 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368128499366 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510953978971 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169596782836 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.