Some people think the news has no connection to people's lives. Therefore, it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that it is a waste of time to spend their time reading the news that appears on newspapers or television because it is not linked to their daily basis. From my perspective, I partly agree with this point of view based on some reasons discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, numerous people think that their individual lives are unaffected by events taking place in the real world. This argument sheds light on those who only consider such new items as fashions or celebrities' stories. In their perspective, the news is something they do not need and they can continue to live without concern about what happened live on TV or news coverage. Additionally, they also say that they can hear through the graphite about a local event that might be fascinating to them.
On the other hand, there are a myriad of compelling reasons as I am convinced that it is paramount to expose the news. Firstly, some kinds of political news bring a huge amount of vital information that directly affects human rights. For example, when having a presidential vote, residents can have a chance to inform their preferences through the news on international television. Secondly, the news media provide useful coverages such as climate change or deadly viruses that can be a potential risk to human life. Therefore, numerous residents must follow the news daily to acquire their knowledge about the existing life.
In conclusion, although there is still an aspect of the news that is not connected to people’s lives, however, an increase of valuable news on politics or people’s health can be a great means to keep up with modern life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...hem. On the other hand, there are a myriad of compelling reasons as I am convinced...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8829787234 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65456028512 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1868842622 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2737238302 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861389538871 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659646473082 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157497289943 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283286847078 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.