Social skills play a vital role in any child's future success, without which they will face many problems in their community in order to make communication with other members of society. A group holes the idea that parents should be in charge of mentoring these skills. However, others think school should carry out this inevitable responsibility. To achieve a clear picture, I intend to put this matter into a comparative perspective.
From one point of view, it is believed that a child's guardian should take the major part in this issue. This rather conservative idea implies that father and mother could through their special bot with their little ones teach social behaviors chest to chest. One reason for this claim is that most babies look up to their parents as the first hero of their life. Although the contrasting paradigm states that the parents do not have ample knowledge to make them qualified for this mission, it is countered the notion that school can teach them this know-how. This view gives me the impression that all parents are not capable to handle this huge responsibility.
There are, from another point of view, who claim that school solely have an impeccable credential to create a conducive condition for youngsters to grasp the communication techniques for their future social lives. This group's main observation is that school is the only institutions where is able to maintain an integrated social education, as a result of which it gains devices such as unique instruction method for this to give the students a united social attitude. Those who disagree think that school does not have enough time to spend for each individual child to transmit this kind of insight to them, whereas, this view is dismissed and addressed through the creation of specific time for this mean in school. It strikes me a sophisticated view because integrity is what we need in our social views in our modernized communities.
On balance, it seems to me that the mindset favoring parents responsibility for children's social manners can actually do more harm than good because an effective solution should encompass much more than just an emotional bond.
I am on the convection that little members of our society should intake these skills mainly in school rather than home. Sight must not be lost of this fact that teachers must use the emotional bond potential of parent to escalate the effectiveness of their education. As a result, concerted effort of home and school along the main role of school could be the panacea for this matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'behaviors'' or 'behavior's'?
Suggestion: behaviors'; behavior's
...bot with their little ones teach social behaviors chest to chest. One reason for this cla...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l could be the panacea for this matter.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 24.0651302605 237% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96962616822 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65014971635 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9748782249 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256268324833 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899951289445 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457711885776 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141085268749 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420958159162 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.