Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Educating people to be good citizens is crucial, especially at a young age. But the answer to the question of who responsible for this mission is unclear. Some say that action should be taken by their parents, while others argue that students can learn it at education faculty. I believe this mission can take a long time, and both should undertake this task.
Parents, on the one hand, are the first individuals who can instruct the morality of young people. At home, immaturity can learn the fundamental principles, such as how to respect others, have the right to behave with people in the family or their relatives, and share them. Such laws will form the basis for different concepts in the future and they must be used on a wide range of occasions, so they need to learn them when they were young, and the people who can teach them are their mother and father. Thus, parents can increase the communication with their children thanks to these lessons, which create a tight bond with them.
However, the family is a limited space to expand their understanding of morals, so children need a bigger environment to advance their behaviors, and school is the ideal place to educate them. Apart from studying subjects, students can learn how to cooperate to accomplish a goal, experience a new living atmosphere where people from different areas with different personalities, and develop their behavior with others. All of these values with be taught by their teachers and they will report to parents to monitor their pupils. Such activities will ensure that the child can grow appropriately and become a member of a society in which everyone can count on.
In conclusion, educating younger generations to become a valuable member of society is difficult since it may take a whole life to accomplish it. So everybody in society should take responsibility to guide them to become helpful members, especially their parents and the schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a responsible'.
Suggestion: who is a responsible
... age. But the answer to the question of who responsible for this mission is unclear. Some say t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93883792049 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6668209702 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4828356141 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200547200678 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720321426757 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377345687691 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125221270162 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481383634397 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.