Some people think that parents should teach their children how to become a good member of the society. School is not a place to learn this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Charity, they say begins at home. To be relevant in the society requires good parenting. Learning institution is not the right place for this. Personally, I agree with this notion as school is primarily made for academic purpose.
For children to be of good conducts require good parenting. If guardians do not have quality time for the wards upbringing, they might end up being wayward. This because they will be left at the mercy of neighbors or even on the street roaming around. Parents should teach and lead their children in the right path by leading by examples. For instance, you can not expect a child to wake in the morning for devotions when the parents have not being doing so. Also, the choice of words, and proper guide in choosing a good career that will benefit the child, family and the society at large by parents is important in making them relevant.
Admittedly, learning institution is not a place to learn moral virtues. Whatever moral that has been learnt from home ought to be practiced in the school. This is because the academic work is cumbersome enough for children, adding moral education to it might be frustrating as the teachers might not not do it in love unlike how their parents will address them. For example, some teachers are extremely aggressive in teaching, so adding moral is like adding punishment for the child. Also, sometimes, the workload on teachers is enough to overlook any silly act from their students instead of correcting them. Hence, leaving these children to learn moral virtues in the school seems to me to be jeopardizing their stand in the society in the future.
In conclusion, it is my view that parents takes full courage to guide their offspring into becoming a good citizen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wards'' or 'ward's'?
Suggestion: wards'; ward's
...rdians do not have quality time for the wards upbringing, they might end up being way...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work is cumbersome enough for children, adding moral education to it might be fr...
^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...ht be frustrating as the teachers might not not do it in love unlike how their parents ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arents takes full courage to guide their offspring into becoming a good citizen.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86287625418 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52833961375 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0417386179 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5294117647 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25054518349 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818553412358 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533649594929 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149737343796 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140729998599 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.