Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically. Others think that printed books still play important roles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the role of physical books in our modern society where electronic books and digital contents are prevalent. Although there are persuasive arguments that conventional publications would remain, I strongly believe that electronic copies would gradually substitue traditional ones.
One the one hand, a variety of reasons can be offered to explain why printed books will still be of great nessessity. Foremost among these is that readers are less likely to suffer from eye strain after they spend long hours reading. This key benefit is appealing to those who are sensitive to blue waves from electronic screens. Another worth mentioning point is that an array of bookworms loves the signature scent of old books, and the possession of a library, which stimulates their reading implulses. Therefore, owning physical copies is vital for many.
One the other hand, while unique values of conventional prints are undeniable, I would argue that digital books would steadily replace the physical versions. Firstly, electronic books are more economical because they do not require an intensive manufacturing process, and publishers can distribute copies quickly. This leads to a higher margin for publishing houses and authors. Moreover, as less materials such as papers are consumed in publishing e-books, this option is more likely to be eco-friendly than conventional method. Finally, the advent of electronic ink and digital paper has revolutionized the publishing industry with paper-like reading, writing on tablets. Those who has deeply-rooted habits of reading paper books could finally adopt a solution to read electronic books.
In conclusion, it seems to me that printed books are slowly losing ground, and, in contrast, digital options are increasingly dominating the whole publication market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun materials is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ishing houses and authors. Moreover, as less materials such as papers are consumed i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pt a solution to read electronic books. In conclusion, it seems to me that print...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85930313074 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1074006591 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18228118877 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579887713523 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578312932178 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109793307937 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120573643122 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.