Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people agree that all adolescents should be required to do unpaid jobs to assist the local society. They think this would benefit both the individual teen and society as a whole. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activities. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
On the one hand, today, because of pressure from school and parents, youngsters just spend time hitting the books. Due to this, teenagers start to not focus on soft skills, so they often have difficult situations in their daily lives. This is a reason why adolescents should join voluntary work; they will learn about various problems that society has to face, such as poverty and pollution. Thus, it can enhance young people's moral development, and they will be empathetic citizens. For example, on the Sai Gon Xanh channel on TikTok, there are many teenagers who realise the pollution and decide to collect garbage under rivers and canals. Thanks to it, they become responsible citizens.
On the other hand, unpaid employment also helps young people have more social contacts and have more experience communicating with various characters or learning a range of skills from others, such as teamwork and management. For example, most universities encourage students to take part in voluntary work. They will be more mature when confronted with the problem in the future.
In conclusion, unpaid work helps adolescents acquire much knowledge of society, important skills, and more responsibility for the community, so they should participate in this.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25882352941 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70407441733 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650980392157 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0057394528 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218626021941 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679796874376 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996022387721 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135613358357 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625290852701 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.