Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades, the number of people that live in skyscrapers increase exponentially in comparison with the past. There are two viewpoints about these individuals. Some people claimed that the habitats in these apartments are usually sadness and lonely sense. In contrary, others believe that live in high-rise apartments have many advantages for families. It seems to me that, although it may lead to people depression, their advantages is more marked for families.
On the one hand, with the increase of population and shortage space particularly in big cities, the apartments usually built in small sizes. Therefore, children cannot play together and became force to play with the smartphone or PlayStation. As a result, they become alone gradually and felt unhappiness after a short time. In addition, parents cannot hold a big and happy ceremonies because of bothering for neighbourhood that habitat in up and down floor. As a consequence, these families will not have a happy life.
On the other hand, since skyscraper built in recent years, therefore, to build them have been utilized from high-quality material, and precise supervision existed for construction them. In conclusion, they are safety and strengthen that these benefits make a calm feel among families when natural disasters such as earthquake occur. Likewise, beside of these apartments there are high facilities such as mall, supermarket, park, and sport places that assistants to families do many of daily works. Thus, they do not involve in heavy traffic for buying many goods.
To sum up, although living in high-rise building may have been a some problem such as shortage space or sadness for families however, I believe that the benefits of living in these places are outweighed the disadvantages mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, may, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36140350877 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87054430779 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9528571405 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164022584727 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541475700581 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747317420579 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109557403409 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804730363335 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.