Some think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires special talent and ability.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Views regarding who can produce excellent art divide. Some maintain that it is achievable by everybody while others believe that unique talents are needed for the task. Both perspectives will be discussed in the following essay.
On one hand, there are compelling arguments that show high-grade art can be made by regular people. Painting or writing music is considered skills that can be learnt through practice and improvement and, compounded with dedication, upgraded to a high level of sophistication. Art classes are organized to help people hone such skills and after these classes, despite lacking an initial talent, students may be able to draw visually appealing paintings and sing melodious songs. Interestingly, luck also factors in. A number of artworks, including a few one-hit-wonders, came to realisation and gain widespread acclaim despite the lack of deliberate effort or talent from their creators.
On the other hand, it is understandable to say that natural talents and aptitude play a key role in producing superlative art pieces.These talents may manifest themselves in a range of abilities, ranging from better color recognition to more sensitive musicality. For highly regarded artists, such as Da Vinci or Mozart, these abilities enabled them to produce time-transcending works. In addition, innate talents in art are often depicted to include creativity. Unlike ordinary people, who tend to follow popularized patterns, those with unconventional thinking can make original marks on the world, which could be illustrated by examples of trailblazers such as the Beatles or Madonna.
Considering both viewpoints, I believe that while quality art is producible by everybody, such fine work is more consistently created by those who possess not only special talents but also the dedication to their craft.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e effort or talent from their creators. On the other hand, it is understandable ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...ole in producing superlative art pieces.These talents may manifest themselves in a ra...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but also the dedication to their craft.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51773049645 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12970936835 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677304964539 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2993522631 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273273049501 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849264352239 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476983989898 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163593017182 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534239077106 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.