Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is true that travelling to the space has been made possible, and there is a widespread belief that humans could be offered opportunities to experience space tourism in the future. From my perspectives, this development has both benefits and drawbacks.
There are some negatives of making a journey to the realms beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. One of the obvious challenges is the health risks facing participants when staying in weightless conditions for a long time. For example, zero gravity would cause motion sickness or even weaken their bones and disrupt their physical functioning. Another downside of entering the outer space is its exorbitant cost, which proves to be out of reach for low- and middle-income communities. The truth is that those who long to join the space voyage have to pay a huge sum of money for spacesuits and other accompanying services. This means that space tourism is readily available and affordable for privileged individuals only.
The upsides of space tourist trips into outer space, however, are indisputable. One benefit is the unprecedented experience that paying spaceflight participants could have when flying to the space. It is the long-standing aspiration of humans to observe the Earth from above, explore a new living space and find a new extraterrestrial life. Accordingly, the availability of space tourism will possibly satisfy their desire. This would in turn inspire scientists to make considerable progress in space science, spurring investments of not only federal agencies but also non-governmental bodies because of its potential returns. To be more precise, the research and development of cosmology could bring about promising outcomes since natural resources on Earth are becoming increasingly depleted, making this planet no longer a desirable place of residence. For this reason, investing in space tourism industry could open up opportunities for the Earthlings to discover other backups for the future generations.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, it is evident that the demerits of travelling to outer space are overshadowed by its merits. I would therefore contend that this is a positive development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42941176471 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11825188362 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7488183912 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.588235294 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347554775885 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100480868765 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056350999141 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203721147854 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523468525745 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.