Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to tackle the issue.
On the one hand, high school graduates completely depend on their parents' support. Moreover, their parents have enough conditions to provide a good life for them, and they do not think too much about their budgets in the future. Moreover, students do not have a chance to engage in skill courses. They are not ready to research that field, so they seem to lack knowledge about skills in money management. One main cause of that issue is that they already do everything to serve their lives, and they do not know the value of money.
There are a number of viable solutions to tackling this problem. Firstly, parents should teach high school graduates how to manage finances properly in secondary school. At that time, students receive pocket money, and their families teach them how to arrange their bubget for guarantees and suitable things. Whereas, they can take their children up to meet or watch videos about difficult situations of other children, which makes students know values of money and use the money properly. Secondly, the school needs to organise some skill lessons for the student, or parents can register for courses about skills in money management. Finally, parents can limit their pocket money to children and are ready to help them find a part-time job that will provide for their needs. The student can arrange their money if they find it themselves.
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...much about their budgets in the future. Moreover, students do not have a chance to engag...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93065693431 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41308227399 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0339716238 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337526524493 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117044873882 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590735327527 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163306733805 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116372777436 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.