Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
These days, graduates lack good skills in money management, which is necessary and essential in society. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
Firstly, most students use money in the wrong way. They waste money on useless things and profitless activities. Gradually, their financial management isn’t improving. Secondly, their parents overindulge; they always give large amounts of money to their children every day. So, their children depend on their parents, and they can’t manage money. Lastly, due to living in a rich family, graduates don’t worry about everything, even finances. Therefore, they don’t understand the value of money and waste it.
There are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. They need a course about economics and financial management from school, and parents should have many methods of teaching their managers about money. One main conclusion from this problem is that parents must change the amount of money they give to their children. They should have a plan to give a tiny amount of money to children in a short time. So, students gradually become aware of managing finances. Financial education should be made a priority in schools, and parents should be encouraged to teach their children from an early age about the value of money. Teaching children to be responsible with money is a key element in helping them avoid the risk of financial hardship.
In conclusion, although money management is a problem for a lot of school leavers, there are a number of viable solutions to counteract this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17910447761 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60106477846 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518656716418 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1308290964 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6470588235 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271884515134 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964835332059 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588092049531 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183164474105 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249017580509 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.