Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught.
To what extent do you agree/disagree?
many people believe that students should study to pass examniation rather than wasting time learning skills like cooking. However, there are both advantages and disadvantages of such trend.
On the one hand, academic knowledge plays a vital role in student’s life. Firstly, it provides sufficient knowlegde for student to practice in the future. For example, in order to qualified to take on higher education, students have to pass serveral exams and acquire a huge amount of academic knowledge. it is hard to imagine how students can handle to pass undergraduate programme without fundamental knowledge from high school or secondary. Furthermore, academic performance is one of the record which the human resources would like to regard in the process of measuring the ablility of certain candidates. some may be disqualified due to that. Therefore, it cannot be denied that academic knowlegde is important for students especially in the tests.
However, pratical skills have an effect to students. Besides from academic records, most of the employer prefer application with specific skills including dressing. No one want to have an employee that is badly dressing to the company as it will affect the company image especially to those working in fashion or media industry. Moreover, attending skill-building classes assist students mainly those who study abroad or live far from home to be more self-indepent. As many people may know, the life of a foreign student does not simple since everything have to be done without others’ aid, from cooking to washing. Thus, there is no such disadvantages to learn these skills beforehand in school.
In conclustion, I deem that academic knowledge and practical skills, either are necessary for students. Hence, if students are taught both, it will benefit the furture in some particular ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many people believe that students should stu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re a huge amount of academic knowledge. it is hard to imagine how students can han...
^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ing the ablility of certain candidates. some may be disqualified due to that. Theref...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39862542955 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93632105161 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1083866747 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4117647059 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259067306828 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719720999522 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329403465218 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140069561316 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021909796587 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.